China and Wikipedia have always had acontentious relationshipand it appears that potency are beginning to realize that if they ca n’t allow access to the website , they ’ll have to build one of their own . But the leader of the fresh project says “ our goal is not to catch up , but overtake . ”
https://gizmodo.com/bots-on-wikipedia-wage-edit-wars-between-themselves-tha-1792680922
South China Morning Postreports :
“ The Taiwanese Encyclopaedia is not a book , but a Great Wall of culture , ” Yang Muzhi , the editor - in - chief of the project and the chairman of the Book and Periodicals Distribution Association of China , told senior scientists at a confluence at the headquarters of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ( CAS ) in Beijing on April 12 , according to a report on the academy ’s web site the next day .
This new online labor will be the third edition of theChinese Encyclopaediaand by far its largest iteration yet . Over 20,000 authors from universities and enquiry institute are work to stock up the publication with over 300,000 entries relating to more than 100 disciplines . The finished product is anticipate to be twice the sizing of the Encyclopedia Brittanica and on par with theChinese languageWikipedia which currently has 938,000 entry .
China ’s Wikipedia problem stage a paradox for a body politic thathas ambitionsto be on the disregard edge of technology and skill while still keep control over the information that its citizen have memory access to . Yang ’s comment that his encyclopaedia will be a “ Great Wall of culture ” repeat the “ Great Firewall ” that limits what areas of the WWW that Chinese netizens are allowed to peruse .
Sites likeBaidu BaikeandBaike.comare privately owned on-line encyclopaedia wikis that accept drug user generated content but they alsostrictly censor contentthat violates government regularization . That has led manyChinese citizens to considerthe overhaul just another sleeve of the state of matter media .
It does n’t appear that this young project will be a wiki , at first , but what ’s interesting is that authorities are waken up to the motive for an easy and precise informational resource . Researchers say that the project was kicked off in 2011 , but Encyclopaedia Britannica ’s conclusion to cease publishing its mark interpretation caused doubts about the viability of an old - fashioned encyclopedia . This led to more receptivity toward 21st - century attack . Professor Huang Annian , a historiographer currently found in the United States is one of the scholars working on the projection and he save a varsity letter to the editorial control panel insisting that go forward , the “ old political fabric ” should be abandoned .
As editor - in - chief , Yang will have to make a case for loosen censorship and maybe allowing crowd - sourced contributions if he wants to achieve his goals . Last year , he argued in a local newspaper that Wikipedia would be a hard competitor , writing , “ The readers consider it to be classic , exact , and it brandmark itself as a ‘ free encyclopedia that anyone can edit out , ’ which is quite bewitching . ”
For now , Yang points to the high - quality of his team of author as a marketing point . Most in all likelihood , Wikipedia ’s leaders is n’t very worried about their new rival . And if the original gratis encyclopedia has inspired more open entropy , that fits with their charge quite nicely .
[ South China Morning PostviaVice News ]
ChinaWikipedia
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , scientific discipline , and culture intelligence in your inbox daily .
News from the futurity , deliver to your present .
You May Also Like
